Integration of Pancasila Values in Merdeka Curriculum: Educational Innovation in the Era of Society 5.0 in Indonesia

Authors

  • Zainuddin Zainuddin Faculty of Tarbiyah, Institute of Islamic Religion al-Qur'an al-Ittifaqiah Indralaya, South Sumatra, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Merdeka Curriculum, Pancasila Values, Society 5.0, Character Education, Digital Competence, Pancasila Learner Profile Introduction

Abstract

Entering the era of Society 5.0, the Indonesian education system faces great challenges in integrating Pancasila values into technology-based learning through the Merdeka Curriculum. The main problem is that the systematic integration of character values has not been optimized, the low digital readiness of schools, and the lack of character evaluation instruments. This study uses a systematic literature review method to analyze the strategies, challenges, and effectiveness of the integration of Pancasila values in the Merdeka Curriculum. The findings show that integration is carried out through a holistic approach: structural (P5), functional (learner profile), and cultural (school culture). The implication is that schools that successfully adopt this approach show improved character, meaningful digital competencies, and strengthened national identity. However, limitations of this study include reliance on secondary literature, publication bias, and a narrow temporal context as the curriculum implementation is still relatively new. Future studies are recommended to use empirical approaches to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of this integration, including the development of digital-based character assessment models. This research confirms that the integration of Pancasila values is not just a complement, but the main foundation of education in the digital era. With the synergy between local values and global innovation, Indonesian education has the potential to form a generation that is smart, characterized, and well-rounded.

References

[1]Wijesinghe A. Identity: the demand for dignity and the politics of resentment [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 May 31]. Available from: https://sljer.sljol.info/articles/178/files/submission/proof/178-1-452-1-10-20221110.pdf

[2]Amir S. Pancasila as integration philosophy of education and national character. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2013;2(1):54-7.

[3]Hidayat MT, Suryadi S, Latifannisa N, Sari SN, Rino R. Evolution of The Education Curriculum in Indonesia. J Innov Educ Cult Res. 2025;6(2):381-95.

[4]Juanda N, Az-Zahra N. Efforts to Instill Character Education in Students in the Digital Era. J Media Sci Educ. 2025;4(1):9-15.

[5]Reza RO, Aufa A. Analysis of Teacher Readiness and Performance in the Implementation of the Independent Curriculum. JP J Pendidik Teori Dan Prakt. 2024;9(1):76-87.

[6]Situmorang LK, Ayuningsih P, Hilaliyah T. Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka: Tantangan dan Peluang. Indo-MathEdu Intellect J. 2025;6(1):361-72.

[7]Hidayatulloh T, Saumantri T, Ramdani Z. Integrating Living Values Education into Indonesian Islamic Schools: An Innovation in Character Building. EDUKASI J Penelit Pendidik Agama Dan Keagamaan. 2024;22(1):137-52.

[8]Lickona T. Chapter IV: Educating for Character: A Comprehensive Approach. Teach Coll Rec Voice Scholarsh Educ. 1997 Aug;98(6):45-62.

[9]Pattaro C. Character education: Themes and researches. An academic literature review. Ital J Sociol Educ. 2016;8(1):6-30.

[10]Ashby-King DT, Boyd KD. Integrative ethical education: An exploratory investigation into a relationally based approach to ethics education. J Commun Pedagogy. 2020;3:65-81.

[11]Abu-Salih B, Alotaibi S. A systematic literature review of knowledge graph construction and application in education. Heliyon [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 3];10(3). Available from: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)01414-2

[12]Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. - Penelusuran Google.

[13]Ramadhani R, Siregar RF, Elfina H. Implementasi Kegiatan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) pada Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Mencegah Perilaku Bullying Pelajar di SMKN 6 Medan. Indo-MathEdu Intellect J. 2024;5(4):4851-8.

[14]Auliyah N, Aliyah ND, Ghozali S. Implementasi Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) Kurikulum Merdeka dalam Meningkatkan Pembentukan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan Siswa di MINU Waru 1 Sidoarjo. AL-MIKRAJ J Studi Islam Dan Hum E-ISSN 2745-4584. 2025;5(2):639-52.

[15]Mahmoudi S, Jafari E, Nasrabadi HA, Liaghatdar MJ. Holistic education: An approach for 21 century. Int Educ Stud. 2012;5(2):178-86.

[16]Miller JP, Karsten S, Denton D, Orr D, Kates IC. Holistic learning and spirituality in education: Breaking new ground. SUNY Press; 2005.

[17]Michael WB, Stanley JC, Bolton DL. Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Educ Psychol Meas. 1957 Dec;17(4):631-4.

[18]Khalifatun S, Nuraida N, Agustin S, Pakpahan VEA, Robbi MIK, Setiyadi B. Implementasi Inovasi Kurikulum Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5): Tinjauan Terhadap Efektivitas dan Dampaknya dalam Pembentukan Karakter. Dharmas Educ J DEJournal. 2025;5(1):248-59.

[19]Nawanti RD, Sumardjoko B, Muhibbin A. Analisis Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dan Budaya Sekolah dalam Implementasi Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) Kurikulum Merdeka pada Siswa SMK Negeri. Didakt J Kependidikan. 2025;14(1 Februari):1029-42.

[20]Azzahra IF, Rahmadhani R. Kurikulum Merdeka: Telaah Potensi dan Tantangan Implementatif dalam Mewujudkan Pendidikan Fleksibel di Indonesia. J Pendidik Indones Teori Penelit Dan Inov [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 May 30];5(3). Available from: https://jurnal.penerbitwidina.com/index.php/JPI/article/view/1530

[21]Hadisti A, Herianto E. Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila: Implementasi, Tantangan, dan Dampaknya bagi Peserta Didik. JPG J Pendidik Guru. 2025;6(2):230-9.

[22]Sucipto S, Sukri M, Patras YE, Novita L. Tantangan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar: Systematic Literature Review. Kalam Cendekia J Ilm Kependidikan [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 3];12(1). Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jkc/article/view/84353

[23]Akman AZ, Erdirençelebi M. A human-centered digital transformation: A bibliometric analysis of society 5.0 and industry 5.0. Istanb Manag J. 2024;(96):1-16.

[24]Deguchi A, Hirai C, Matsuoka H, Nakano T, Oshima K, Tai M, et al. What is society 5.0. Society. 2020;5(0):1-24.

[25]Salgues B. Society 5.0: industry of the future, technologies, methods and tools. John Wiley & Sons; 2018.

[26]Trilling B, Fadel C. 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

[27]Shiroishi Y, Uchiyama K, Suzuki N. Society 5.0: For human security and well-being. Computer. 2018;51(7):91-5.

[28]Rampai SB. ARTIFICIAL IN℡LIGENCE DALAM PENDIDIKAN. [cited 2025 Jun 3]; Available from: https://eprints.uad.ac.id/82855/1/PDF_Artificial%20Intelligence%20dalam%20Pendidikan_Sudaryanto%2C%20dkk.pdf

[29]Maryani I. Artificial intelligence dalam pendidikan: sebuah bunga rampai. K-Media; 2025.

[30]Berkowitz MW, Bier MC. What works in character education: A research-driven guide for educators [Internet]. St. Louis, MO: Character Education Partnership-John Templeton Foundation; 2005 [cited 2025 Jun 3]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marvin-Berkowitz-2/publication/251977043_What_Works_In_Character_Education/links/53fb5ea60cf22f21c2f31c28/What-Works-In-Character-Education.pdf

[31]Arthur J, Kristjánsson K, Harrison T, Sanderse W, Wright D. Teaching character and virtue in schools [Internet]. Routledge; 2016 [cited 2025 Jun 3]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com

[32]Latif Y. Negara paripurna: historisitas, rasionalitas, dan aktualitas Pancasila. Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2011.

[33]Oduro H. Factors influencing implementation of early childhood new curriculum in public schools at Bia-West District [Internet] [PhD Thesis]. University of Education, Winneba; 2024 [cited 2025 May 31]. Available from: http://ir.uew.edu.gh:8080/handle/123456789/4204

[34]Fullan M, Pomfret A. Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation. Rev Educ Res. 1977 Jun;47(2):335-97.

[35]Change E. Leading in a Culture of Change [Internet]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2001 [cited 2025 Jun 3]. Available from: https://www.stgeorgeshouse.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Culturechange.final_.pdf

[36]Burger JM, Webber CF, Klinck P, editors. Intelligent Leadership: Constructs for Thinking Education Leaders [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2007 [cited 2025 Jun 3]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4020-6022-9

[37]Fullan M. The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education. J Educ Change. 2016 Nov;17(4):539-44.

[38]Fullan M. The moral imperative of school leadership. Corwin press; 2003.

[39]Kemdikbudristek BS. Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen-Kurikulum Merdeka. Retrieved Kemdikbud Httpsditsmp Kemdikbud Go Iddownloadpanduan-Pembelajaran-Dan-Asesmen-Kurikulum-Merdeka. 2022;

[40]Suryaman M. Orientasi pengembangan kurikulum merdeka belajar. In: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra. 2020. p. 13-28.

[41]Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2019;104:333-9.

[42]Xiao Y, Watson M. Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. J Plan Educ Res. 2019 Mar;39(1):93-112.

[43]Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods. 2020 Mar;11(2):181-217.

[44]Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec;18(1):143.

[45]Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Bmj [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2025 Jun 1];339. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2535.short

[46]Neuendorf KA. Content analysis and thematic analysis. In: Advanced research methods for applied psychology. Routledge; 2018. p. 211-23.

[47]Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405.

[48]Denzin NK. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods [Internet]. Routledge; 2017 [cited 2025 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315134543/research-act-norman-denzi

[49]Templier M, Paré G. A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;37(1):6.

[50]Gunawan I, Bahari Y. Problematika kurikulum merdeka dalam sudut pandang teori struktural fungsional (study literatur). J Hum Educ JAHE. 2024;4(4):178-87.

[51]Lickona T. Character matters: How to help our children develop good judgment, integrity, and other essential virtues. Simon and Schuster; 2004.

[52]Rahayuningsih F. Internalisasi filosofi pendidikan ki hajar dewantara dalam mewujudkan profil pelajar pancasila. Soc J Inov Pendidik IPS. 2021;1(3):177-87.

[53]Lestari C, Pratiwi RD, Pratama DJ, Safitri S. Kesenjangan Digital dan Dampaknya terhadap Pendidikan. RISOMA J Ris Sos Hum Dan Pendidik. 2025;3(4):01-16.

[54]Fauzan A. The Transformation of Traditional Culture in Responding to the Challenges of Globalization in Local Indonesian Communities. J Acad Sci. 2025;2(3):1021-30.

[55]Utami PR, Rahmawati L, Noktaria M. Pengembangan Kompetensi dan Soft Skill dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka: Tinjauan Literatur. MANAJERIAL J Inov Manaj Dan Supervisi Pendidik. 2025;5(1):55-65.

[56]Rohimah R. Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Abad 21 dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Pendekatan dan Implementasinya bagi Guru PAI. Edukatif. 2025;3(1):224-30.

[57]Wahyudin W, Pamungkas MI, Nuryah N. Pemberdayaan Santri Melalui Penguatan Nilai-Nilai Kebangsaan Dalam Falsafah Hidup Pancasila Era Generasi Alpha. Dedik J Pengabdi Masy. 2025;7(1):62-80.

[58]Alauddin MB, Fitri D, Wenando FA. Tradition to Technology: The Transformation of Indonesian Culture in the Social Media Era. Asian J Media Cult. 2025;1(1):1-21.

[59]Hasanudin C. Revolusi Media Pembelajaran di Era Society 5.0 untuk Mendorong Pembelajaran berbasis Teknologi. Seval Literindo Kreasi; 2025.

[60]Wahab G, Adawiyah SR. Application of the Blended Learning Approach in Developing Student Character in the Digital Era of the 21st Century. J Acad Sci. 2025;2(1):84-94.

[61]Gellisch M, Cramer J, Trenkel J, Bäker F, Bablok M, Morosan‐Puopolo G, et al. Introducing the contextual digital divide: Insights from microscopic anatomy on usage behavior and effectiveness of digital versus face‐to‐face learning. Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Apr;18(4):347-64.

[62]Tarumingkeng IRC. Teknologi Pembelajaran:| LMS era Digital. [cited 2025 Jun 1]; Available from: https://rudyct.com/ab/Teknologi.Pembelajaran.Learning.Management.Systems(LMS)Era.Digital.pdf

[63]Firmansyah R, Hamzah S, Almuntarizi A. Etika Digital dan Pancasila: Sinergi Transformasi Pelajar melalui Proyek Inovasi Teknologi Digital. Pancasila J Keindonesiaan. 2025;5(1):89-100.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-05

Issue

Section

Articles