The Impact of AI Educational Robots on Early Childhood Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/6tdtjg06Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Educational Robots, Early Childhood Education, Mathematics Learning, Computational ThinkingAbstract
Early childhood mathematics education faces persistent challenges, including limited student engagement and difficulties in fostering foundational mathematical thinking through traditional methods. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered educational robots have emerged as innovative tools to support early math learning by offering interactive, personalized, and developmentally appropriate experiences. This systematic literature review, conducted by PRISMA guidelines, highlights the pedagogical potential of AI robotics in early mathematics education and recommends future research employing longitudinal and cross-cultural designs, as well as a line with PRISMA guidelines, examined 28 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025, sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, and other academic databases. The included studies focused on typically developing children aged 3–6 years and explored outcomes related to mathematical learning, computational thinking, cognitive development, and engagement. Findings indicate that AI educational robots can significantly enhance early numeracy skills, spatial reasoning, executive functions, and learner motivation, particularly when integrated within STEAM-based and project-based learning frameworks. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, short intervention durations, and lack of cultural and contextual diversity persist across the literature. This review underscores the pedagogical potential of AI robotics in early mathematics education and calls for future research employing longitudinal and cross-cultural designs, as well as more robust integration of robotics into authentic classroom environments to support scalable and sustainable implementation.
References
[1]Emen-Parlatan, M., & Aslan, D. (2023). Technology and early mathematics skills: Effectiveness of I Love Math with Robots. Journal of Educational Research, 116(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2203092
[2]Zhang, S.-H. (2022). Applying Artificial Intelligence into Early Childhood Math Education: Lesson Design and Course Effect. International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, 635–638. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00109
[3]Hijón‐Neira, R., Pizarro, C., Borrás-Gené, O., & Cavero, S. (2024). AI-Generated Context for Teaching Robotics to Improve Computational Thinking in Early Childhood Education. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121401
[4]Su, J., Yang, W., Yim, I. H. Y., Li, H., & Hu, X. (2024). Early artificial intelligence education: Effects of cooperative play and direct instruction on kindergarteners’ computational thinking, sequencing, self‐regulation and theory of mind skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13040
[5]Review on Artificial Intelligence and Robots in STEAM Education for Early Childhood Development. (2022). Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education, 468–498. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8649-5.ch019
[6]Macrides, E., Miliou, O., & Angeli, C. (2022). Programming in early childhood education: A systematic review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 32, 100396.
[7]Chaldi, D., & Mantzanidou, G. (2021). Educational robotics and STEAM in early childhood education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 72-81.
[8]Shumway, J. F., Welch, L. E., Kozlowski, J. S., Clarke-Midura, J., & Lee, V. R. (2023). Kindergarten students’ mathematics knowledge at work: the mathematics for programming robot toys. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 25(4), 380-408.
[9]Alam, A. (2022, March). Educational robotics and computer programming in early childhood education: a conceptual framework for assessing elementary school students’ computational thinking for designing powerful educational scenarios. In 2022 International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
[10]Haas, B., Lavicza, Z., Houghton, T., & Kreis, Y. (2022, June). Evaluating technology-enhanced, STEAM-based remote teaching with parental support in Luxembourgish early childhood education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 872479). Frontiers Media SA.
[11]Okur, E., Sahay, S., Alba, R. F., & Nachman, L. (2022). End-to-end evaluation of a spoken dialogue system for learning basic mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.03511.
[12]Ani-Rus, A., Catalano, C., Mestic, G., & Catalano, H. (2023). A Study Regarding Early Teachers' Perception Toward the Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Applications and the Use of Educational Robots in the Teaching Process. Educatia 21, (25), 336-346.
[13]David, K. H., Peawat, D. Z., & Ladan, N. J. (2023). The Future of Science Teaching: Pre-Primary Teachers' Knowledge of Educational Robotics in STEM Learning in Plateau State. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(5), 1278-1283.
[14]Berrezueta-Guzman, S., Dolón-Poza, M., & Wagner, S. (2025). Supporting Preschool Emotional Development with AI-Powered Robot. In Proceedings of the 24th Interaction Design and Children (pp. 1134-1139).
[15]Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
[16]Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... & Moher, D. (2018). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
[17]Alam, A. (2022). Educational robotics and computer programming in early childhood education: A conceptual framework for assessing elementary school students' computational thinking for designing powerful educational scenarios. In the 2022 International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN).https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTSN53084.2022.9761354
[18]Dinler, H. (2024). Intelligent educational robots in early childhood education: Building the future. In Intelligent Educational Robots Toward Personalized Learning Environments (pp. 169–197).
[19]Palmér, H. (2017). Programming in preschool—with a focus on learning mathematics. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 8(1), 75–87.
[20]Kim, H. J., & Song, M. S. (2017). Development of a teaching model for STEAM using Rlearning educational robot to promote young children’s creative problemsolving ability. Advanced Science Letters, 23(10), 10445–10450. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10471
[21]Mariappan, M., Sing, J. C., & Wee, C. C. (2017). Early childhood educational robotic system (C-Block): A design methodology. Advanced Science Letters, 23(11), 11206–11210. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10252
[22]Karachristos, C., Nakos, K., Komis, V., & Misirli, A. (2018). e ProBotLab: Design and evaluation of an open educational robotics platform. In Research on E Learning and ICT in Education: Technological, Pedagogical and Instructional Perspectives (pp. 339–365).2017
[23] Chin, C. (2025). Raising young coders: A parent’s guide to teaching programming at home (pp. 1–150).
[24]Alam, A. (2022, September). Educational robotics and computer programming in early childhood education: A conceptual framework for assessing elementary school students’ computational thinking for designing powerful educational scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Systems for Next Generation Computing (ICSTSN) (pp. [page numbers, if known]). IEEE.
[25]Di Lieto, M. C., Inguaggiato, E., Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell’Omo, M., Laschi, C., Pecini, C., Santerini, G., Sgandurra, G., & Dario, P. (2017). Educational robotics intervention on executive functions in preschool children: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.018
[26]Hu, C. C., Yang, Y. F., & Chen, N. S. (2024). Integrating educational robots and low-cost self-made toys to enhance STEM learning performance for primary school students. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(8), 1614–1635..https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2222308
[27]Nebot, P. D. D., Vera, D. A., & Somoza, J. A. G. C. (2018). Problem-solving elements in early childhood education with Bee-bot. EDMA 0–6: Educación Matemática en la Infancia, 7(1), 12–41.
[28]Kim, H. J., & Song, M. S. (2017). Development of a teaching model for STEAM using R learning educational robot to promote young children’s creative problem solving ability. Advanced Science Letters, 23(10), 10447–10452. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.10471
[29]Haas, B., Lavicza, Z., Houghton, T., & Kreis, Y. (2022). Evaluating technology-enhanced, STEAM-based remote teaching with parental support in Luxembourgish early childhood education. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 872479..https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.872479
[30]Berciano-Alcaraz, A., Salgado-Somoza, M., & Jiménez-Gestal, C. (2022). Computer literacy in early childhood education: Difficulties and benefits in a 3-year-old classroom. Revista Electronica Educare, 26(2).https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-2.15
[31]Su, J., Yang, W., Yim, I. H. Y., Li, H., & Hu, X. (2024). Early artificial intelligence education: Effects of cooperative play and direct instruction on kindergarteners' computational thinking, sequencing, self‐regulation, and theory of mind skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 2917-2925.
[32]Sala-Sebastià, G., Breda, A., & Font, V. (2025). Characterising computational and geometric thinking in pre-service early childhood education teachers by playing with MATLAB. Education and Information Technologies..https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13589-3
[33]Tarrés-Puertas, M. I., Costa, V., & Dorado, A. D. (2023). Child-robot interactions using educational robots: An ethical and inclusive perspective. Sensors, 23(3).10.3390/s23031675
[34]Isnaini, R., Budiyanto, C., & Widiastuti, I. (2019). Robotics-based learning to support computational thinking skills in early childhood. In the 2nd International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Environment, and Education (ICoSMEE 2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11843-0
[35]Manera, L. (2020). STEAM and educational robotics: Interdisciplinary approaches to robotics in early childhood and primary education. In 12th International Workshop on Human-Friendly Robotics (HFR 2019) (pp. 103–109).
[36]Çetin, M., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2020). Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: A systematic literature review. Early Child Development and Care, 190(9), 1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1534844
[37]Gerosa, A., Koleszar, V., Tejera, G., GómezSena, L., & Carboni, A. (2022). Educational robotics intervention to foster computational thinking in preschoolers: Effects of children's task engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 904761. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904761
[38]Welch, L. E., Shumway, J. F., Clarke-Midura, J., & Lee, V. R. (2022). Exploring measurement through coding: Children’s conceptions of a dynamic linear unit with robot coding toys. Education Sciences, 12(2), Article 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020143
[39]Kyprianou, G., Karousou, A., Makris, N., Sarafis, I., Amanatiadis, A., & Chatzichristofis, S. A. (2023). Engaging learners in educational robotics: Uncovering students’ expectations for an ideal robotic platform. Electronics, 12(13), 2865. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132865
[40]Heikkilä, M. (2020). What happens when the robot gets eyelashes? Gender perspective on programming in preschool. In STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum: Early Childhood to Senior Secondary (pp. 29–44).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuxi Zhang (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
